Murder is always bad, but when done by a physician, sworn to help the patients and save their lives, murdering them is shocking and outrageously egregious….
On April 7th 2025, the Canadian Medical Association Journal published “Changes in Local access to Mifepristone dispensed by community pharmacies for medication abortion in Ontario: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study.” CMAJ 2025, April 7th: 197:E345-54.doi:10.1503/cmaj.241505. It seems the purpose of this study was to discover if induced abortion had been expanded by having Mifepristone listed as a “commonly prescribed and dispensed medicine” and it seems as far as that it has been successful given that those living in a region with either an abortion provider or pharmacy dispensing, mifepristone rose from 37% in 2017 to 91% in 2022.
Abstract – Background:
Although mifepristone for medication abortion has been available in Canada since a regulatory change in 2017, leading to its rapid uptake, the effects of this availability on regional access to abortion are unknown. We sought to examine how community pharmacy dispensation of mifepristone affected distribution of abortion services over time in Ontario, Canada.
Methods:
We used linked health administrative data to identify a cohort of all medication and procedural abortions provided in Ontario from 2017 to 2022, defined by outpatient mifepristone dispensations and abortion billing, diagnostic, and procedure codes. We evaluated changes over time in the annual proportion of community pharmacies that dispensed mifepristone and the availability and distribution of medication and procedural abortion services across geographic regions, defined by postal code forward sortation areas.
Results:
In 2017, 2% of Ontario pharmacies filled 1 or more prescriptions for mifepristone, which increased to 20% in 2022. In 2017, few regions contained a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy (19%) or procedural abortion service (18%). By 2022, most regions had local access to a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy (77%), with geographically distributed abortion services across Ontario. Although only 37% of abortion service users lived in a region with either a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy or procedural provider in 2017, this increased to 91% by 2022.
Interpretation:
Access to medication abortion across Ontario increased substantially within 5 years of mifepristone’s availability as a normally prescribed and dispensed medication. This regulatory approach appears successful for achieving widespread access to local abortion services……”
I was interested to know what a “normally prescribed and dispensed medication” was and so I looked it up on the Internet and found the following:
Normally prescribed and dispensed medication is a pharmaceutical drug that requires a prescription from a licensed healthcare professional before it can be dispensed to a patient. These medications are typically used to treat specific medical conditions and require professional judgment for safe and effective use.
Examples of commonly prescribed medications:
- Antidepressants: For conditions like depression and anxiety.
- Antihypertensives: Used to manage high blood pressure.
- Antidiabetics: To control blood sugar levels in individuals with diabetes.
- Antibiotics: To treat bacterial infections.
- Statins: To lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of heart disease.
- Proton pump inhibitors: To reduce stomach acid and treat conditions like
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=what+is+a+normally+prescribed+medication
So, would someone please tell me how Mifepristone can be described as a “normally prescribed and dispensed medication” for such a natural condition as pregnancy, in light of the fact that the above conditions all appear to be pathological – is the medical establishment now defining pregnancy as a pathological condition?
At the beginning of this article, I used a couple of quotes which I believe we need to start taking to heart.
Are we really, comfortable with medical professionals, now including, midwives and nurse practitioners as well as physicians, killing our children before birth at a mother’s request for any reason?
The Canadian Abortion statistics for 2023 provide a tragic picture of 101,553 preborn children killed by medical professionals for a staggering 4.7 million children killed by abortion since 1969 in Canada.
This medical killing does not only happen at the beginning of human life but also at the end with over 60,000 Canadians having been euthanized by physicians and nurse practitioners in 8 years. In an article I read recently it raised the question of where has the soul of medicine gone? In Vitro fertilization is also another area where human life is wantonly destroyed by medical health professionals with over 98% of the little ones created in this procedure losing their lives in order for less than 2% to live. What has happened to the heart, let alone the soul of medicine in 2025?
In January 2024 Alliance for Life commissioned a study on women who have undergone induced abortion in Canada, which resulted in the following study by David Reardon, ”The Prevalence and Effects of Unwanted Abortions in Canada: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Abstract – Background:
It is common for women to report feeling pressured into abortions. Those who abort contrary to their own values and preferences are more likely to experience more negative emotional and psychological outcomes. But the full breadth and timing of negative reactions has not been fully explored, especially among Canadians.
Methods:
Portions of the Unwanted Abortion Studies were deployed in a survey of 1,141 Canadian women 41-45 years of age, inclusive, to compare the types and degree of pressures they face compared to their American counterparts. Twenty-three additional symptoms were assessed as well as a measure of when, if at all, negative post-abortion reactions were most severe.
Results:
With a 98.3% completion rate, 26.7% of eligible respondents reported a history of abortion. Moderate to high levels of pressure were reported from the male partner (48%), family members (37%), other persons (33%), financial pressures (69%) and other circumstances (77%). Ninety-one percent reported moderate to high levels of pressure to abort on at least one scale. Pressure to abort was positively correlated with all negative outcomes investigated, including a self-attributed decline in mental health. The worst of negative reactions occurred immediately after their abortions for 35%, while 40% reported delayed negative reactions, including the 15% who stated that the worst effects “continue to persist, even today” an average of twenty years later.
Discussion:
Most Canadian women with a history of abortion felt pressured to abort contrary to their own values and preferences. Negative reactions manifest in numerous ways, but all are associated with feeling pressured to abort. The pressures Canadian women face are similar to those reported by American women with the exception that they are somewhat more likely to feel pressured to abort by their male partners.
This study showed that 60% of Canadian women had” unwanted abortions,” forced or coerced by boyfriends, family, peers or circumstance, against their own values and preference!! How is that choice?
Since March 2024, our author, David Reardon has been trying to have this work published and is being turned down again and again, finally the latest rejection from the Canadian Association Medical Journal, which apparently has no interest in studies negative toward abortion.
…I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion. With purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practice my art…
https://websites.umich.edu/~uc260/Library/Hippocratic.pdf
How the once mighty and noble profession has fallen.
